background preloader

Nature of Science Misconceptions

Facebook Twitter

Miscon sci know nat. Misconceptions. Misconceptions Home Bookmarks Overcoming Science Misconceptions: Learning Theories and Science Education Nature & Origin of Some Misconceptions Basic Misconceptions of Chemistry Misconceptions at the Macroscopic Level of Chemistry Misconceptions at the Sub-microscopic Level of Chemistry Steve Bush, Human Development: Adolescence EPS 500D, National-Louis University (February 16, 2005) I was enlightened and somewhat shocked by A Private Universe, a video documentary shown in my physical sciences methods class.

Misconceptions

A Private Universe brings the dilemma facing all science educators into sharp focus; why do not even the brightest students truly grasp basic science concepts? Strauss (1993) surveyed the basic theories of learning and development that have been applied to this topic. In the Piagetian scheme, there is little room for children’s understanding of science concepts as they are taught in school. Many studies have documented the common scientific concepts misconstrued by adolescents. References. Unit Plan: Teaching the Nature of Science. The First Days Try to open the course with some sort of dramatic "grabber".

Unit Plan: Teaching the Nature of Science

This will get their attention, and instantly impress your students that this is not just another "ho-hum" course. (In fact, you should try to do SOMETHING off the wall, dramatic, unusual or unexpected EVERY DAY, so that your students will look forward to being there, everyday, with great anticipation). Two different scenarios are suggested here. They have both been used, with considerable success (as measured by pre/post testing). Scenario A: Illusions 1. Scenario B: Deep Ignorance This dramatic opening emphasizes the idea that we actually know very little about the universe, compared to what we could know. RESOURCE: A very interesting book, just out (1999), by Ken Miller, is "Finding Darwin's God" (see "What's New", go to "Book News").

The Practice and Nature of Science - Analyzed. The following information has accurate and inaccurate information.

The Practice and Nature of Science - Analyzed

The inaccurate information is labeled misconceptions since they are often thought accurate by students and other people. Explain what makes the misconceptions inaccurate. Scientific knowledge Scientific knowledge is tentative, empirically based, subjective (theory based), partly the product of human inference, imagination and creativity, embedded in social and cultural contexts. Subjective means based on or influenced by personal feelings, tastes, opinions or perspectives of existence.

Scientific practices or nature Scientific practice is the collection and interpretation of data and the derivation of conclusions. Myths of the nature of science. People have ideas about science based on personal experiences, previous education, popular media and peer culture.

Myths of the nature of science

Many of these ideas are commonly held misconceptions or myths about the nature of science. Here are some of the more common myths that are problematic in science education. Myth: The scientific methodMyth: Experiments are the main route to scientific knowledgeMyth: Science and its methods can answer all questionsMyth: Science proves ideasMyth: Science ideas are absolute and unchangingMyth: Science is a solitary pursuitMyth: Science is procedural more than creativeMyth: Scientists are particularly objectiveMyth: Scientific conclusions are reviewed by others for accuracyMyth: Acceptance of new scientific knowledge is straightforwardMyth: Science models ‘are real’Myth: A hypothesis is an educated guessMyth: Hypotheses become theories that, in turn, become laws.

Misconception About the Nature of Scientific Knowledge - College Essays - Iggy45. Misconception about the nature of scientific knowledge (nature of science) The definition of scientific knowledge is that it is “accumulated by systematic study and organized by general principles”.

Misconception About the Nature of Scientific Knowledge - College Essays - Iggy45

Many people think that scientific knowledge is absolute and cannot change, but this is not true, because science is a process for producing knowledge the process is to make careful observations of phenomena and to invent theories out of those observations. Change in knowledge is necessary, because new observations may demand knowledge of current theories. Most scientific knowledge is durable, even though scientists reject the thought of they are accomplishing absolute truth. but when there are new information through new technology the knowledge might change. They rather modified ideas than reject them. Nowadays we have more powerful data analysis techniques and better equipment for observations and experiments, so we have now much greater intelligence of scientific knowledge.

Misconceptions about teaching the nature and process of science.