Sedgwick - Law Firm Publications & Presentations - <em>"The People vs. Amgen"</em>: Study Subjects Sue to Receive Investigational Drugs. June 2006 What duties do pharmaceutical companies owe to the subjects of clinical drug trials sponsored by those companies? That question has been the subject of new debate within U.S. courts over the last twelve months in two important cases. In April and June 2005, two separate groups of people who had been subjects in a Parkinson’s disease clinical trial sponsored by Amgen, Inc. – represented by the same attorneys – sued Amgen in federal court for permanent injunctive relief and monetary damages. Suthers, et al. v. Amgen, Inc., Cause No. 05-CV-4158(PKC) (S.D.N.Y. filed April 26, 2005); Abney, et al. v. The Clinical Trial Amgen hoped to see a 25% increase in the study subjects’ scores relative to placebo after six months of treatment in the study.
The Litigation Upon filing suit in Kentucky and New York federal district courts, both groups of plaintiffs asked the courts to issue preliminary injunctions forcing Amgen to continue providing them with GDNF. Both courts disagreed.
Holiday Wishlist. The Failure of Results-Only Performance Management and How to Fix It. Recognize This! – Employees deliver more consistent results when you make clear “how” you want them to work as well as “what” you want them to deliver. Do you know what your employees are doing when you’re not watching them? Are you confident they fully understand what you need them to do and are consistently delivering on that goal – even when you’re not around? Even if you answer confidently, “Yes!” Chris Edmonds brought this to light in research he featured in his Cool Culture blog: “Leaders typically focus entirely on performance and results. If you want confidence beyond a doubt that your employees are consistently behaving in ways that deliver the results you need – whether you’re watching or not – then you must make it very clear to employees what behaviors you value.
So how do you do that? Let’s face it. Make those values real and clear with specific messages of praise and thanks for demonstrating those values with specific, strategic recognition. How do you manage? Remember the Patient. The Picker Award for Excellence, which recognizes outstanding achievement in promoting and furthering patient-centered care, was awarded to Dr. Don Berwick on Wednesday, Dec. 7, the last day of the 23rd annual national forum hosted by the Institute for Healthcare Improvement, which Dr. Berwick cofounded in 1989. Below are his comments accepting the award: Don Berwick, MD IHI National Forum Orlando, Florida: December 7, 2011 Let me begin by thanking the Picker Institute for this honor.
And, I need to say a word about Maureen Bisognano. It is good to be back. The time at CMS has been a privilege. And, I got the chance to help pilot toward harbor the most important health care policy of our time – the Affordable Care Act. I would have loved to keep at that job longer. I want this afternoon to share with you a little of what I learned on the expedition; and what I think it means for you – for all of us. And that leads me to a second big lesson. Cynicism grips Washington. How did that happen? Tony Schwartz: The Myths of the Overworked Creative :: Videos :: The 99 Percent. Time is finite, but we act as if it were otherwise, assuming that longer hours always lead to increased productivity. But in reality our bodies are designed to pulse and pause – to expend energy and then renew it. In this revelatory talk, energy expert Tony Schwartz debunks common productivity myths and shows us how to regain control over our energy so we can produce great work.
Tony Schwartz is founder and CEO of The Energy Project, a company that helps individuals and organizations fuel energy, engagement, focus, and productivity by drawing on the science of high performance. Tony has written four bestselling books, including The Way We’re Working Isn’t Working, published in 2010, and The Power of Full Engagement: Managing Energy Not Time, co-authored with Jim Loehr.Tony has also published widely about leadership, engagement, and culture change. Www.theenergyproject.com@tonyschwartz. Wikis- New Media Technologies - Information Resources & Technology (IRT) - Stanford University School of Medicine. “Wiki wiki” means "rapidly" in the Hawaiian language. The term WIKI is a generic name for a web-page that can be editted quickly without having to learn HTML. IRT provides MedWiki (SUNet ID required) and MedWiki-Secure (members only) for secure collaboration and document sharing with Stanford School of Medicine groups.
MedWiki is powered by Confluence, a popular enterprise wiki platform from Atlassian Software. What your team can do with MedWiki Easily store and share content and documents, with anyone with a SUNet ID, or, just with your work group Access content securely anytime from anywhere through a browser Securely store and share private documents and information Share, manage, and comment on information Easily make edits that update instantly Track every change or rollback to a previous version Find stored information quickly, unlike emails Limit access to pages and documents to specific people What your team can do with MedWiki-Secure HIPAA Compliance in MedWiki-Secure »
Take Control of E-mail Interruptions | At the Whiteboard | BNET. Summary of the Rules of Evidence. We can only cover both the federal and California law of evidence in a brief essay like this by a ruthless process of selection and compression. What we will cover can best be thought of as that essential kernel of the law of evidence that the trial lawyer must carry in his head.1 Our task would be impossible but for two important facts. First, all of you have studied the law of evidence before, either in a course on evidence or in preparation for the bar exam.
Accordingly, most of the rules presented will already be familiar to you. What we will do here is to try to review, organize, and reinforce that law so that you can apply it with confidence when you need it. Second, most of the rules of evidence need not be covered here because they are either so obvious that you already know all you need to know about them or they apply only in limited circumstances.
There are four traditional types of evidence: real, demonstrative, documentary, and testimonial. Prejudice means improper harm. 1. Evidence California distinctions Flashcards. California Evidence Code. Legal Research Home > California Laws > Evidence Code > California Evidence Code California Evidence Code Section 1 This code shall be known as the Evidence Code. California Evidence Code Section 2 The rule of the common law, that statutes in derogation thereof are to be strictly construed, has no application to this code.
California Evidence Code Section 3 If any provision or clause of this code or application thereof to any person or circumstances is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other... California Evidence Code Section 4 Unless the provision or context otherwise requires, these preliminary provisions and rules of construction shall govern the construction of this code. California Evidence Code Section 5 Division, chapter, article, and section headings do not in any manner affect the scope, meaning, or intent of the provisions of this code. California Evidence Code Section 6 California Evidence Code Section 7 California Evidence Code Section 8 California Evidence Code Section 9. CV054007243S - Theresa Sokaitis v. Rose Bakaysa - CT Superior Court. Theresa Sokaitis v. Rose Bakaysa -- May 11, 2010 “Sisters, sisters, there were never such devoted sisters ․ Caring, sharing, everything little thing that we are wearing.” 1 Two once-close octogenarian sisters are embroiled in a family feud over a $500,000 Powerball lottery ticket.
The plaintiff, Theresa Sokaitis (Terry), brought this action for breach of contract, seeking to recover money damages from her sister, the defendant, Rose Bakaysa (Rose), alleging that Rose had breached an agreement between the parties to share equally in any winnings from, inter alia, lottery tickets. This action was brought by civil complaint and summons on August 19, 2005. Terry filed an appeal. This case has been characterized as one involving two sisters, both well into their eighties, “fighting” over a $500,000 lottery Powerball ticket.
The sisters grew up in a family of ten brothers and sisters in New Britain. In January 1995, Terry “hit” the big jackpot playing Carribbean poker for $165,000. Swienton, J. COA reverses judgment on contract-rescission claim against lottery | The Indiana Lawyer. The Indiana Court of Appeals will allow lottery scratch-off game players’ claim of contract rescission against the state’s lottery commission to proceed to trial, but the court affirmed summary judgment in favor of the commission on the other claims filed by the players in a class-action suit. In Jeff Koehlinger, et al. v. State Lottery Commission of Indiana, No. 49A02-1003-CT-247, Jeff Koehlinger and other plaintiffs sued the State Lottery Commission of Indiana for contract rescission, false advertisement, negligence, negligent misrepresentation, unjust enrichment, restitution, and money had and received.
They sued because of misrepresentations on the lottery’s website regarding the odds of winning when purchasing “Cash Blast” tickets. More than 2.5 million tickets had to be replaced before they went on sale because of a manufacturing defect; this caused the lottery’s computer system to overstate the number of unclaimed prizes on the website. Lottery Winnings and Clarence Jackson. Topic:LOTTERIES; CONNECTICUT LOTTERY CORPORATION; LEGISLATIVE INTENT; Location:GAMBLING - LOTTERY; You asked for (1) background information on Clarence Jackson's $5.8 million Lotto jackpot claim and (2) a list and legislative history of bills and amendments proposed since 1997 to extend the deadline for submitting lottery claims. You also want to know if the Connecticut Lottery Corporation (CLC) or the Division of Special Revenue (DSR) has ever honored any late claims.
Clarence Jackson lost a $5.8 million Lotto jackpot because he submitted his claim three days after the agency's one-year deadline for claiming lottery prizes. He sued CLC to honor the claim but the court ruled that Jackson's failure to submit his claim within the deadline relieved CLC, as a matter of law, of any obligation to pay him the prize money. Since 1997, legislators have proposed at least eight bills and seven amendments to extend the one-year deadline for claiming lottery prizes. That: VR:dw. Pando v. Fernandez.
Pando v. Fernandez, 127 Misc.2d 224 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1984), is a New York case that arose when Christopher Pando, a deeply religious minor, sought to impose a constructive trust on the proceeds of a winning $2.8 million (21 annual payments; no cash option) ticket that he purchased with Dasyi Fernandez’s money. Pando alleged that Mrs. Fernandez agreed to share the prize money equally with him if he prayed to a saint to cause the numbers he picked for her to be the winning numbers. Holding[edit] The New York Supreme Court for New York County, the trial level court in New York, held that Pando had no legally enforceable claim on the proceeds of the winning lottery ticket since it would be impossible for him to prove in court that his faith and prayers brought about a miracle that caused the defendant to win. Plaintiff’s Claims[edit] Pando, through his father and guardian, John Pando, claimed a breach of a partnership agreement.
Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss[edit] Mrs. Court’s Reasoning[edit] Association of American Cancer Institutes - AACI. Scientific Review Committee (SRC) - Clinical Trials - Stanford Cancer Center. The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks « Rebecca Skloot. Her name was Henrietta Lacks, but scientists know her as HeLa. She was a poor black tobacco farmer whose cells—taken without her knowledge in 1951—became one of the most important tools in medicine, vital for developing the polio vaccine, cloning, gene mapping, in vitro fertilization, and more.
Henrietta’s cells have been bought and sold by the billions, yet she remains virtually unknown, and her family can’t afford health insurance. Soon to be made into an HBO movie by Oprah Winfrey and Alan Ball, this New York Times bestseller takes readers on an extraordinary journey, from the “colored” ward of Johns Hopkins Hospital in the 1950s to stark white laboratories with freezers filled with HeLa cells, from Henrietta’s small, dying hometown of Clover, Virginia, to East Baltimore today, where her children and grandchildren live and struggle with the legacy of her cells. Pfizer Voluntarily Withdraws Cancer Treatment Mylotarg from U.S. For Immediate Release: June 21, 2010Media Inquiries: Erica Jefferson, 301-796-4988, erica.jefferson@fda.hhs.govConsumer Inquiries: 888-INFO-FDA FDA: Pfizer Voluntarily Withdraws Cancer Treatment Mylotarg from U.S.
Market Pfizer Inc. today announced the voluntary withdrawal from the U.S. market of the drug Mylotarg (gemtuzumab ozogamicin) for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), a bone marrow cancer. The company took the action at the request of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration after results from a recent clinical trial raised new concerns about the product’s safety and the drug failed to demonstrate clinical benefit to patients enrolled in trials. Mylotarg was approved in May 2000 under the FDA’s accelerated approval program. Under accelerated approval, the company is required to conduct additional clinical trials after approval to confirm the drug’s benefit.
A confirmatory, post approval clinical trial was begun by Wyeth (now Pfizer) in 2004. For more information: 10 Attitudes of Successful Workers - Career Advice.