Media about wikileaks
Of all the responses to the recent WikiLeaks affair, one of the most interesting was the argument that the leaks actually are not a big deal. The idea seems to be that the political damage from the leaks to the governments who have supported the war can be minimized by arguing that what has been leaked is simply not all that important. Probably the best proponent of this view was an op ed from a fellow at the Center for a New American Security in the New York Times . The argument is based on the proposition that the leaks do not tell us anything new of any importance, but rather paint a more detailed picture of what was already known to analysts. Azeem Ibrahim: Don't Let Anyone Fool You That the WikiLeaks Affair Is Not Important
22 June 2010 Last updated at 09:23 GMT By Chris Vallance BBC News Julian Assange talks about Bradley Manning Whistleblower website Wikileaks has made contact with the US government over claims that an American serviceman is one of its sources. Soldier Bradley Manning has been held for three weeks without formal charge. The US is investigating claims that he passed confidential information to Wikileaks. Site editor Julian Assange told BBC News that, so far, the US authorities have not yet been in touch with him. Wikileaks makes contact with US government
Why WikiLeaks Is The Pirate Bay of Political Intelligence WikiLeaks is currently in the news because its Afghan War logs comprise one of the largest and most controversial intelligence leaks to date. But while WikiLeaks is relatively new to the public, it is actually a product of a long-established culture. That culture has already had a banner-bearer; a quintessential exemplification of its values — The Pirate Bay . WikiLeaks is akin to The Pirate Bay, but for another purpose.
Alexander Hotz is a freelance multimedia journalist and public radio junkie based in New York City. Currently he teaches digital media at Columbia University's Graduate School of Journalism. Follow Alex on Twitter at @hotzington . Why WikiLeaks and the Mainstream Media Still Need Each Other
The furore surrounding WikiLeaks continues this week, as US Senators reportedly working on a “media-shields” legislation to protect journalists from revealing sources are making amendments to ensure no such protection can be afforded to the whistleblowing site. According to a report by the NYTimes.com , senators Charles Schumer and Dianne Feinstein are drafting the amendment to outline that the bill’s protections would “extend only to traditional news-gathering activities and not to websites that serve as a conduit for the mass dissemination of secret documents”. Quoting Schumer in a statement he claims the amendments will ensure there is no chance of the law ever being used to protect websites like WikiLeaks. WikiLeaks should not be spared in any way from the fullest prosecution possible under the law. US source protection bill amended to exclude WikiLeaks | Journalism.co.uk Editors' Blog
Senators and , Democrats of New York and California, are drafting an amendment to make clear that the bill’s protections extend only to traditional news-gathering activities and not to Web sites that serve as a conduit for the mass dissemination of secret documents. The so-called “media shield” bill is awaiting a vote on the Senate floor. “WikiLeaks should not be spared in any way from the fullest prosecution possible under the law,” Mr. After Afghan War Leaks, Revisions in a Shield Bill
This is a rush transcript. Copy may not be in its final form. AMY GOODMAN : For reaction to the WikiLeaks documents, we’re joined now by world-renowned political dissident and linguist Noam Chomsky, Professor Emeritus at Massachusetts Institute of Technology, author of over a hundred books, including his latest, Hopes and Prospects . Well, 40 years ago, Noam and the late historian Howard Zinn helped government whistleblower Daniel Ellsberg edit and release the Pentagon Papers, the top-secret internal U.S. history of the Vietnam War. Noam Chomsky joins us now from Boston. It’s good to have you back again, Noam.
This is a rush transcript. Copy may not be in its final form. JUAN GONZALEZ : We begin today’s show looking at the Obama administration’s recent crackdown on whistleblowers and leakers of classified information. Pentagon investigators are reportedly still searching for Julian Assange, the founder of the whistleblowing website Wikileaks. Earlier this month it was revealed the website might be in possession of hundreds of thousands of classified State Department cables, as well as video of massacres committed last year by US forces in Afghanistan. Wikileaks made international headlines in April when it released a classified US military video showing a US helicopter gunship indiscriminately firing on Iraqi civilians, killing twelve people, including two employees of the Reuters news agency. With Rumored Manhunt for Wikileaks Founder and Arrest of Alleged
Wikileaks, Resistance, Genuine Heroes, and Breaking the Goddamned Rules (II) [ Part I ] Life and Death in the Obedience Culture I have sometimes described America today as an "obedience culture."
Rarely does a lobbyist listen to someone and feel utterly impressed, no strings or cautious thoughts attached…Or at least, not an “old rot” like me…But today, just for a few minutes, I felt like “not all was lost”…that some sense would come out of the ongoing debates on how to “handle the Internet” if someone with the eloquence, brains and proven delivery record of Julian Assange could be invited to speak in a place such as the European Parliament, in the context of the ALDE organised debate on (Self) Censorship and Freedom of Expression in Europe . And so he did, and he did well, at both a philosophical level and in terms of quoting facts, cases, real life. Sitting on the panel was also the representative of the Icelandic Parliament that spearheaded their “Safe Haven” law for publishers and whistle blowers, and a professor specialised in libel and defamation laws, whom I will not name just in case he sues me for “attacking his reputation”, as he seemed really gung ho on that one. Listening to Wikileaks Julian Assange at the European Parliament
Administration Hardens Stance Against Leaks to Press - NYTimes.c He took his concerns everywhere inside the secret world: to his bosses, to the agency’s inspector general, to the Defense Department’s inspector general and to the Congressional intelligence committees. But he felt his message was not getting through. So he contacted a reporter for The Baltimore Sun. Today, because of that decision, Mr. Drake, 53, a veteran intelligence bureaucrat who collected early computers, faces years in prison on 10 felony charges involving the mishandling of classified information and obstruction of justice.
ABCnews Truth or Dare Andrew Fowler
Bio Julian Assange Julian Assange is an Australian journalist, programmer and Internet activist, best known for his involvement with Wikileaks, a whistleblower website. Lowell Bergman Lowell Bergman is the Reva and David Logan Distinguished Professor of Investigative Reporting at the Graduate School of Journalism at UC Berkeley, and director of the Investigative Reporting Program. Video: Logan Symposium: The New Initiatives
WikiLeaks Documents: What War Info Can Be Verified? | PBS NewsHour
news + public affairs player: video
Eric Schmidt Click on the photo to download a larger, print-quality image. Since joining Google in 2001, Eric Schmidt has helped grow the company from a Silicon Valley startup to a global leader in technology. As executive chairman, he is responsible for the external matters of Google: building partnerships and broader business relationships, government outreach and technology thought leadership, as well as advising the CEO and senior leadership on business and policy issues.
TRUCKEE, Calif.--For those concerned with privacy, Google CEO Eric Schmidt gave them a few more things to start worrying about. At a conference here Wednesday, Schmidt noted that using artificial intelligence, computers can take 14 pictures of anyone on the Internet and stand a good chance of identifying that person. Similarly, the data collected by location-based services can be used not only to show where someone is at, but to also predict with a lot of accuracy where they might be headed next. "Pretty interesting," Schmidt said. Schmidt "true anonymity is too dangerous."
In the past week, both the Washington Post and the New York Times have referred to WikiLeaks.org , the web site that publishes confidential records, as a “whistleblower” site. This conforms to WikiLeaks’ own instructions to journalists that “WikiLeaks should be described, depending on context, as the ‘open government group’, ‘anti-corruption group’, ‘transparency group’ or ‘whistleblower’s site’.” But calling WikiLeaks a whistleblower site does not accurately reflect the character of the project. Wikileaks Fails “Due Diligence” Review
Wikileaks source suspect Manning transferred from Kuwait to Quantico, VA
John Naughton on WikiLeaks | Technology | The Observer
Epoch Times - Wikileaks, Transparency, and National Security
Wikileaks editor interrogated by US border police - Americas, World
WikiLeaks: An Editor-In-Chief Or Prolific Source?
How WikiLeaks Is Changing the World
Al WP Broadcasting board decides Voice of America can peruse WikiLeak documents
Wikileaks: History Is The Only Guidebook Civilization Has (Daniel Schmitt at re:publica 2010) | Flickr : partage de photos !
NOS Zoekresultaten : wikileaks
Three digital myths
Pentagon-papirer sikret i atom-bunker - VG Nett om Sverige
Wikileaks now hosted from an underground nuclear bunker
WikiLeakiLeaks: Open Attack or Honest Attempt At Media Transparency?
Wikileaks Servers Move To Underground Nuclear Bunker
Are Wikileaks Activists Finally Realizing Their Founder Is a Megalomaniac?
WikiLeaks: The revolution has begun – and it will be digitised | Heather Brooke | Comment is free
Wikileaks: bondgenoot van journalisten | Villamedia Community
WikiLeaks: Transforming journalism - Al Jazeera Top 10 Of The Year
media outlets reflecting on partnerships with wikileaks