
law
Get flash to fully experience Pearltrees
Legal history
The Bill of Rights is the collective name for the first ten amendments to the United States Constitution . These limitations serve to protect the natural rights of liberty and property . They guarantee a number of personal freedoms, limit the government's power in judicial and other proceedings, and reserve some powers to the states and the public. While originally the amendments applied only to the federal government, most of their provisions have since been held to apply to the states by way of the Fourteenth Amendment . The amendments were introduced by James Madison to the 1st United States Congress as a series of legislative articles.
United States Bill of Rights
Institute for Information Law - Instituut voor Informatierecht
Cloud Computing in Higher Education and Research Institutions and the USA Patriot Act , J.V.J. van Hoboken , A.M. Arnbak , N.A.N.M. van Eijk and with the assistance of N.P.H. Kruijsen , November 2012. Institutions have started to move their data and ICT operations into the cloud. It is becoming clear that this is leading to a decrease of overview and control over government access to data for law enforcement and national security purposes. This report looks at the possibilities for the U.S. government to obtain access to information in the cloud from Dutch institutions on the basis of U.S. law and on the basis of Dutch law and international co-operation.Freedom of information requests to the BBC include questions about its iPlayer. Photograph: Jonathan Hordle / Rex Features The BBC has received 3,701 Freedom of Information requests covering information "held for purposes other than those of journalism, art or literature" since the Act was introduced in 2005, a(nother) FoI request shows, published via What Do They Know? . Due to the broadcaster's unique position as a publicly-funded body, the BBC is only obliged to facilitate requests not directly related to its creative output. In the seven months of 2010 alone, the BBC received 529 FoI requests to which it is obliged to provide the information.
Every BBC freedom of information request made - and what happened to it. As a spreadsheet | News
After years of debate, ICC Member States agree on definition of
14 June 2010 – Member States of the International Criminal Court ( ICC ) have agreed on what constitutes the crime of aggression, a long-running source of contention in international law, after nearly one decade of discussion. Nations agreed to amend the Rome Statute , which set up the Court, to define the crime of aggression as “the planning, preparation, initiation or execution, by a person in a position effectively to exercise control over or to direct the political or military action of a State, of an act of aggression which, by its character, gravity and scale, constitutes a manifest violation of the Charter of the United Nations.” Under the resolution adopted at the end of the two-week-long ICC review conference in Kampala, Uganda, on Friday, blockades of ports or coasts of a State by armed forces of another State, as well as an invasion or attack by troops of one State on the territory of another, are considered as acts of aggression under the statute.The Declaration of Independence: A Transcription IN CONGRESS, July 4, 1776. The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America, When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.
Declaration of Independence - Transcript
President Obama yesterday signed into US law legislation aimed at protecting American authors, journalists and academics from Britain's libel laws. The Securing the Protection of our Enduring and Established Constitutional Heritage Act, known as the SPEECH Act, makes libel judgments against US writers in foreign territories unenforceable if they are perceived to counter the First Amendment right to free speech. The British-based Libel Reform Campaign has expressed concern that Britain's reputation is being damaged internationally due to what it calls "our restrictive, archaic and costly libel laws, which cost 140 times the European equivalent." The SPEECH Act is inspired by the Libel Terrorism Protection Act passed by the New York State assembly in February 2008, after American academic Dr Rachel Ehrenfeld was sued in London by an Arab businessman Sheikh Khalid bin Mahfouz . Only 23 copies of her book Funding Evil were sold in Britain compared to thousands distributed in the US.

