BLOGs

< <

Get flash to fully experience Pearltrees

Net Money Making - Learn How To Make Money Online

Tabbloid

This is the second part of an analysis of different consumer Internet business models the originally ran on TechCrunch. It is suggested that you first read Part I . Most consumer Internet startups fall into a baker’s dozen of possible business models. In the first part of this post, I tried to lay out the three main buckets those business models fall into (media, paid service, and physical commerce) and then began to sketch out the first four business models (search, gaming, social networks, and new media).

TechCrunch Teardown: 13 Consumer Internet Business Models (Part II) « The World According To Carp

http://worldaccordingtocarp.wordpress.com/2010/10/15/techcrunch-teardown-13-consumer-internet-business-models-part-ii/

TechCrunch Teardown: 13 Consumer Internet Business Models (Part I) « The World According To Carp

This post originally ran on TechCrunch . You can check out my previous analyses of Groupon , Zynga , Chegg , Pandora and Etsy . And my interviews with Bambi Francisco on Vator.tv here and here .

http://worldaccordingtocarp.wordpress.com/2010/10/14/techcrunch-teardown-13-consumer-internet-business-models-part-i/

Smart Idea Box | Home

RSS

AGGREGATOR-ITALIA

MUTUI

Free wp themes | Wp templates - Part 10

Technorati

NewsIsFree

A nuclear disarmament policy might look fine on a Lib Dem leaflet but it would cost our party and the country dear As the next election gets closer, a steady stream of commentators have speculated that Labour could go back to the days of advocating unilateral nuclear disarmament by abandoning the programme to build the new submarines that will carry Britain's deterrent . Some hope Ed Miliband will be different to the succession of Labour leaders who believed unilateralism would leave the UK more vulnerable to a future nuclear threat while doing precious little to advance the vitally important cause of global non-proliferation and disarmament. Others think that the need to restrict spending means that a future Labour government should write off the £3bn that will already have been invested in the new submarines to avoid the remaining construction costs over the subsequent two decades.