English paper. A 'COMMONSENSE' THEORY OF DETERRENCE AND THE 'IDEO... EBSCOhost: Why My Opinion Shouldn’t Count: Revenge, Retribution, and the Death Penalty... EBSCOhost: The Death Penalty: Cruel and Unusual? JSTOR: Social Psychology Quarterly, Vol. 54, No. 1 (Mar., 1991), pp. 67-75. Capital Punishment - News - Times Topics. Death Penalty Sought In Bay Toll Plaza Killings. Top 10 Pros and Cons. Readings - History Of The Death Penalty. As far back as the Ancient Laws of China, the death penalty has been established as a punishment for crimes.
In the 18th Century BC, the Code of King Hammurabi of Babylon codified the death penalty for twenty five different crimes, although murder was not one of them. The first death sentence historically recorded occurred in 16th Century BC Egypt where the wrongdoer, a member of nobility, was accused of magic, and ordered to take his own life. During this period non-nobility was usually killed with an ax. In the 14th Century BC, the Hittite Code also prescribed the death penalty. The 7th Century BC Draconian Code of Athens made death the penalty for every crime committed. Mosaic Law codified many capital crimes.
Britain influenced the colonies more than any other country and has a long history of punishment by death. In Britain, the number of capital offenses continually increased until the 1700's when two hundred and twenty-two crimes were punishable by death. Wilkerson v. DEATH PENALTY ARGUMENTS: Pros and Cons. I came across this article on line while researching something else.
It was so good, in fact it is an excellent article, I decided to copy it here to share with everyone on the site. It was written in 2001 by a grieving Aunt. This Paper in Memoriam of Sean Burgado My Precious Nephew - Murdered June 7, 1969 to May 21, 1997 Deterrent or Revenge (Pros and Cons) What is Capital punishment? DEATH PENALTY ARGUMENTS. This Paper in Memoriam of Sean Burgado My Precious Nephew - Murdered June 7, 1969 to May 21, 1997 Deterrent or Revenge (Pros and Cons) What is Capital punishment?
When the word death penalty is used, it makes yelling and screaming from both sides of extremist. Radley Balko: Why Americans Still Support The Death Penalty. It has long been the conventional wisdom on both sides of the death penalty debate that if a state or the federal government were ever shown to have executed an innocent person, we'd see a dramatic drop in support for state executions.
In the 2006 case Kansas v. Marsh, Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, a death penalty supporter, called the search for a wrongly executed person the "Holy Grail" of death penalty opponents. But a little less than two years after David Grann made a convincing argument in The New Yorker that the state of Texas had done just that, public support for capital punishment hasn't wavered. In October 2009, Grann wrote about Cameron Todd Willingham, executed in 2004 for setting the fire that killed his three young children. Willingham was convicted because of forensic testimony from fire officials that arson experts call junk science. Consider also the case of Hank Skinner, currently on death row in Texas for the murder of his ex-girlfriend and her two sons. Pro-death penalty.com.
Deterrence (In Support of the Death Penalty) Society has always used punishment to discourage would-be criminals from unlawful action.
Since society has the highest interest in preventing murder, it should use the strongest punishment available to deter murder, and that is the death penalty. If murderers are sentenced to death and executed, potential murderers will think twice before killing for fear of losing their own life. For years, criminologists analyzed murder rates to see if they fluctuated with the likelihood of convicted murderers being executed, but the results were inconclusive. Then in 1973 Isaac Ehrlich employed a new kind of analysis which produced results showing that for every inmate who was executed, 7 lives were spared because others were deterred from committing murder. Similar results have been produced by disciples of Ehrlich in follow-up studies.
Netflix. JSTOR: The Journal of Politics, Vol. 65, No. 2 (May, 2003), pp. 397-421.