Widget Interface. Abstract This specification defines an application programming interface (API) for widgets that provides, amongst other things, functionality for accessing a widget's metadata and persistently storing data.
Status of this Document This section describes the status of this document at the time of its publication. Other documents may supersede this document. A list of current W3C publications and the latest revision of this technical report can be found in the W3C technical reports index at This document has been reviewed by W3C Members, by software developers, and by other W3C groups and interested parties, and is endorsed by the Director as a W3C Recommendation.
This is the 31 October 2013 W3C Recommendation of the Widget Interface specification. Emerging Specs: Exploring Device Orientation and Motion. RemoteStorage-2011.10 - Unhosted Web Community Group. Introduction Adding WebFinger, OAuth and Cross-Origin Resource Sharing (CORS) to an online storage makes it usable as per-user storage for web apps.
Polyglot Markup: HTML-Compatible XHTML Documents. When applying JavaScript and CSS to polyglot markup, the goal is to get the same result whether consumed as HTML or as XML.
It is therefore important to be aware of scripting and styling features that give different results in HTML vs XML. These issues comes in addition to the polyglot usage rules for raw text elements. 4.11.2 CSS: Attribute selectors that require a namespace prefix To be able to select namespaced attributes in XML, the attribute selector must include a namespace prefix. [SELECT] For the unprefixed, namespaced attribute xmlns, a polyglot selector that works in both HTML and XML can be created by using the asterisk (*) for the namespace prefix, indicating that the selector is to match all attribute names without regard to the attribute's namespace: Example 18 Example 19 Note Example 20 In cases where the user agent does not support namespaces in CSS and/or in markup, it is necessary to use more than one selector. HTML5 differences from HTML4. Abstract "HTML5 Differences from HTML4" describes the differences of the HTML5 specification from those of HTML4.
Status of This Document This section describes the status of this document at the time of its publication. Touch Events Specification. Abstract The Touch Interface specification defines a set of low-level events that represent one or more points of contact with a touch-sensitive surface, and changes of those points with respect to the surface and any DOM elements displayed upon it (e.g. for touch screens) or associated with it (e.g. for drawing tablets without displays).
It also addresses pen-tablet devices, such as drawing tablets, with consideration toward stylus capabilities. When can I use... Support tables for HTML5, CSS3, etc. HTML5 Please - Use the new and shiny responsibly.
Device Access. DeviceOrientation Event Specification. Abstract This specification defines several new DOM events that provide information about the physical orientation and motion of a hosting device.
HTML5Labs - Download. Offline Storage. Performance. Multimedia. 3D Graphics.
HTML5. This specification defines the 5th major version, second minor revision of the core language of the World Wide Web: the Hypertext Markup Language (HTML).
In this version, new features continue to be introduced to help Web application authors, new elements continue to be introduced based on research into prevailing authoring practices, and special attention continues to be given to defining clear conformance criteria for user agents in an effort to improve interoperability. W3C HTML5 Specification. A vocabulary and associated APIs for HTML and XHTML Editor's Draft 28 September 2012 Latest Published Version: Latest Editor's Draft: Previous Versions: Editors: Robin Berjon , W3C Travis Leithead , Microsoft Silvia Pfeiffer Erika Doyle Navara , Microsoft Edward O'Connor , Apple Inc.
Previous Editor: Ian Hickson , Google, Inc. This specification is available in the following formats: single page HTML , multipage HTML , web developer edition . Copyright © 2012 W3C ® ( MIT , ERCIM , Keio ), All Rights Reserved. W3C Web IDL Specification. This section describes a language, Web IDL, which can be used to define interfaces for APIs in the Web platform.
A specification that defines Web APIs can include one or more IDL fragments that describe the interfaces (the state and behavior that objects can exhibit) for the APIs defined by that specification. W3C WebApps Working Group. WebRTC 1.0: Real-time Communication Between Browsers. AddIceCandidate The addIceCandidate() method provides a remote candidate to the ICE Agent.
In addition to being added to the remote description, connectivity checks will be sent to the new candidates as long as the ICE Transports setting is not set to none. This call will result in a change to the connection state of the ICE Agent, and may result in a change to media state if it results in different connectivity being established. If the candidate parameter is malformed, throw a SyntaxError exception and abort these steps. If the candidate is successfully applied, the user agent MUST queue a task to invoke . If the candidate could not be successfully applied, the user agent MUST queue a task to invoke with a DOMError object whose name attribute has the value TBD (TODO InvalidCandidate and InvalidMidIndex).
Note. WebRTC. Shadow DOM. Introduction document tree (a tree that has document as its root), there are typically many functional tree fragments, as well as assumptions about these fragments operating independently. This specification calls this type of encapsulation a functional encapsulation , as opposed to trust encapsulation , which deals with limiting information flow based on trust and ensuring security of data and state within an application. Functional encapsulation is primarily concerned with establishing functional boundaries in a document tree. Boundary hereon) is a delineation of functional concerns between two loosely coupled units of functionality.