Log Management Central | Log management and SIEM news, opinions, advice, and fun. Electronic Library, The | The use of metadata and preservation methods for continuous access to digital data. Archival Science, Volume 7, Number 1. RESEARCH METHODS: PLANNING: Hypothesis & Focused Question. Untitled Document. A hypothesis is never proved or disproved! In fact, an investigator who sets out to prove a hypothesis would lose the impartiality of the research investigation (Leedy and Ormrod, 2001). In research, an investigator is able to either support or reject a hypothesis. If a hypothesis is rejected, it will lead an investigator to new hypothesis to explain the phenomenon in question. If a hypothesis is continually supported, it may evolve into a theory (Leedy and Ormrod, 2001). As a hypothesis is continually supported over time by a growing body of data, it becomes a theory. A theory that is continually validated over time by a growing body of data becomes a law. Manifest and latent functions and dysfunctions.
Manifest and latent functions are social scientific concepts first clarified for sociology by Robert K. Merton.[1] Merton appeared interested in sharpening the conceptual tools to be employed in a functional analysis. Functions[edit] Peter L. Berger describes a series of examples illustrating the differences between manifest and latent functions: While Talcott Parsons tends to emphasize the manifest functions of social behavior, Merton sees attention to latent functions as increasing the understanding of society: the distinction between manifest and latent forces the sociologist to go beyond the reasons individuals give for their actions or for the existence of customs and institutions; it makes them look for other social consequences that allow these practices’ survival and illuminate the way society works.
Dysfunctions[edit] Manifest dysfunctions are anticipated disruptions of social life. Medical science model[edit] Quotes[edit] References[edit] External links[edit] Further reading[edit] Viewer.media.bitpipe.com/985899539_355/1301493848_228/Quest_DataProtect_EvalBizReqClassifyData.pdf. Penn State Thesis Template | Information Technology Services / Consulting and Support Services. The Scholarly Kitchen. Image via Wikipedia Constance Malpas, Program Officer at OCLC, has just published an excellent report entitled “Cloud-sourcing Research Collections: Managing Print in the Mass-digitized Library Environment.” The whole report is essential reading, but I’d like to pull out two points that particularly struck me, the first from page 14: The emergence of a mass-digitized book corpus has the potential to transform the academic library enterprise.
I would put it much less cautiously than that — the emergence of a mass-digitized book corpus cannot fail to transform the academic library enterprise. The extent of the transformation will depend on several factors, of course, including the content and accessibility of the corpus — but librarians’ opinions about the mass-digitization program will have no effect at all. What should cause concern for academic libraries is the fact that such a corpus already exists, and is growing by the day; the dam holding it back is fragile and cracking.
Like this: