background preloader

Image upload to server

Facebook Twitter

S3 bucket and resize

Rename file in s3 bucket using node. s3 and express. Using Amazon S3 as an Image Hosting Service. In Reducing Your Website's Bandwidth Usage, I concluded that my best outsourced image hosting option was Amazon's S3 or Simple Storage Service.

Using Amazon S3 as an Image Hosting Service

S3 is a popular choice for startups. For example, SmugMug uses S3 as their primary data storage source. There have been a few minor S3-related bumps at SmugMug, but overall the prognosis appears to be good. After experimenting with S3 myself, I'm sold. The costs are reasonable: No start up fees, no minimum charge $0.15 per GB for each month of storage $0.20 per GB of data transferred It's not exactly unlimited bandwidth, but I was planning to spend $2 a month on image hosting anyway. Unfortunately, Amazon doesn't provide a GUI or command-line application for easily transferring files to S3; it's only a set of SOAP and REST APIs. There is Jungle Disk, which allows S3 to show up as a virtual drive on your computer, but Jungle Disk offers no way to make files accessible through public HTTP.

That was before I found the S3Fox Organizer for FireFox. In how many ways can we store images of our web application? Dynamic Cloud File Storage with Amazon (AWS) S3. Using AWS S3 to Store Static Assets and File Uploads. Last updated 27 May 2020 Amazon Simple Storage Service (S3) is a “highly durable and available store” that is ideal for storing application content such as media files, static assets, and user uploads.

Using AWS S3 to Store Static Assets and File Uploads

S3 allows you to offload the storage of static files from your app. This is crucial on Heroku, because your app’s dynos have an ephemeral filesystem. This means that all files that aren’t part of your application’s slug are lost whenever a dyno restarts or is replaced (this happens at least once daily). Overview All files in S3 are stored in buckets. Access to the S3 API is governed by an Access Key ID and a Secret Access Key. Static Web Content and AWS. Cloud9 + S3 - Route 53 = Rapid Static… Responses What are your thoughts?

Static Web Content and AWS. Cloud9 + S3 - Route 53 = Rapid Static…

There are currently no responses for this story. Be the first to respond. Static Web Content and AWS Blunt Jackson Dec 24, 2019 · 8 min read Cloud9 + S3 - Route 53 = Rapid Static Web Site AWS Nomads #2: The scrappy internet app developer will always need a quick way to get static content flowing. To keep reading this story, get the free app or log in. To keep reading this story, create a free account. Open in app Or, continue in mobile web Sign up with Google Sign up with Facebook Already have an account? Discover Medium Welcome to a place where words matter. Make Medium yours. AWSD1W2 photo and rekognition. How to Set Up Your S3 Bucket with HTTPS in an Hour – The New Stack. Stackery sponsored this post.

How to Set Up Your S3 Bucket with HTTPS in an Hour – The New Stack

Amazon Web Services (AWS) has great resources for issuing and using SSL certificates, but the process of migrating existing resources to HTTPS can be complex — and it can also require many intermediate steps. But as this tutorial shows, you can get your S3 bucket set up in just an hour or two. Why is this necessary, anyway? Reason 1: Google is Forcing the Issue The big driver for this need is Google, which is phasing support for HTTP connections out of Google Chrome. Currently, Chrome warns users when they’re accessing a site HTTP, but doesn’t prevent it altogether. The recently rollout out labeling. It won’t be long before accessing almost any site via HTTP will prompt a full-screen warning.

This is a site with bad HTTPS, but it gives you a notion of how HTTP might look in the near future. Reason 2: It’s the Right Thing to Do HTTP connections reveal, at a minimum, full information about the routing and content of requests to everyone else on the local network. Uploading Files to AWS S3 with Node.js. Introduction Much of the software and web apps we build today requires some kind of hosting for files - images, invoices, audio files, etc.

Uploading Files to AWS S3 with Node.js

The traditional way to store files was just to just save them on the server's HDD. However, saving files onto the HDD of the server comes with limitations such as not being able to scale up, being required to allocate space before using and much higher/non-flexible prices. Not to mention, requesting a huge amount of (potentially large) images can really put a strain on the server. To offload the servers, developers started hosting files with could storage providers such as AWS S3, Google Cloud Storage, etc.