background preloader

United States Government

Facebook Twitter

9/11: 'Awkward gaps and contradictions in official explanations' - You betcha! Share 9/11: 'Awkward gaps and contradictions in official explanations' - You betcha! By Lori Price, www.legitgov.org 26 Jan 2011 We read: US fury over UN expert's 9/11 'cover-up' claims 25 Jan 2011 The United States on Tuesday demanded the sacking of a UN human rights expert for "noxious" [?] Comments claiming there had been a US cover-up over the September 11 attacks... Except that the events of September 11th were not a 'bin Laden' operation. They were a Cheney/Neo-con operation, six ways to Sunday. I'd like to know *once and for all* how Osama bin Laden was able to command NORAD to 'stand down' the morning of the 9/11 attacks? Answer: He didn't. Image: 9-11 Research. US Treasury Sec Admits US Default Imminent. Cryptome. Patriot Mythology. This is a WARNING! Regardless of how much you have read, studied or “learned”, and regardless of how good it sounded or how real it seemed at the time, it is possible that, regardless of the source, what you thought was true might simply be a myth.

This becomes a particularly difficult situation when the source of the information upon which such beliefs are formed came from authoritative sources like: parents, teachers, schools, governmental officials, official media sources, etc. Because so much of the information found on the internet (and in other media sources) was generated by third party sources that have little or no substantive or authoritative base, such sources are not reliable. Nonetheless, when people read or study from such sources they begin to develop opinions they convince themselves they learned the truth from a reliable source. With that admonition it seems wise to do your own research, not trusting hearsay from any source. The chart topping Corp U.S. Corp. Corp. The United States: A Corporation « REALITY BLOG. The “United States” is a corporation… If you really want to understand why this is true, then you will have to look at each of the following pieces of the puzzle (links)… This will take a lot of your time and more importantly, the suspension of your idealism and belief.

That is hard. Trust me, I know. I just spent an hour putting this post together and am passing this information on to you, so please don’t let it go to waste. Consider it an early Christmas present! Let’s focus on proving the corporate structure of the Federal Government, so that there is no doubt in your mind… Here is the first carrot that I will dangle in front of you to get you to keep reading! U.S. . § 3002. 15) ‘‘United States’’ means— (A) a Federal corporation; (Source: ) Wam, bam, thank you mam! So when did this happen…? Now read the last two paragraphs in Article 1, Section 8 here: Nazis Were Given ‘Safe Haven’ in U.S., Report Says. The 'American dream' is actually Swedish: study. Published: 03 Nov 2010 18:00 GMT+01:00Updated: 03 Nov 2010 18:00 GMT+01:00 While US voters shunned the Democratic Party's traditionally redistributive policies in Tuesday's mid-term elections, most Americans actually prefer a wealth distribution model similar to Sweden's, writes the AFP's Andrew Beatty.

Forget the socialist-bashing rhetoric and reverence for the filthy rich, when it comes to wealth distribution, Americans -- even Republicans -- would really rather live somewhere like Sweden. According to a soon-to-be published study by researchers at Harvard and Duke universities, Americans believe US society is much more equal than it really is, and want it to be even fairer.

Business school professors Michael Norton and Dan Ariely asked 5,522 Americans about US wealth distribution and how it should look if things could be changed. According to Norton and Ariely this tops "even the levels seen just before the Great Depression in the 1920s. "