Tracing the Origins of Subquantum Kinetics. Paul A. LaViolette - Earth Under Fire, Galactic Superwaves & Subquantum Kinetics. Subquantum kinetics. Comparison: Conventional Physics and Astronomy to Subquantum Kinetics. Superwave Theory and Subquantum Kinetics Predictions. By Paul LaViolette from Etheric Website Contents Predictions Part I: astronomy and climatology Predictions Part II: physics and astronomy Predictions Part I - astronomy and climatology Superwave Theory Predictions and their Subsequent Verification Galactic Core Explosions - prevailing concept (1980): At the time of this prediction, astronomers believed that the cores of galaxies, including our own, become active ("explode") about every 10 to 100 million years and stay active for about a million years. Since our own Galactic core presently appears quiescent, they believed it would likely remain inactive for many tens of millions of years. Although, in 1977, astronomer Jan Oort cited evidence that our Galactic core has been active within the past 10,000 years.
Subsequent concurrence (1998): In 1988, when presented with Dr. Cosmic Ray Propagation - prevailing concept (1980 - 1983) Verification (1985): Verification (1997): Verification (2000): Cosmic Ray Bombardment - prevailing concept (1980 - 83) AntigravityPropulsion.pdf (application/pdf Object) OPEN SETI PHYSICS 101. The scientific and engineering building blocks that form SETI's intellectual foundation and technology consist of Newtonian physics; Darwinian evolution; Maxwellian electromagnetic theory; classical radio technologies developed in the 1940s and 1950s; the Oparin-Haldane hypothesis of the synthesis of life from prebiotic soup and lightning (1950s); the Fourier transform and Fast Fourier Transform algorithms first used on computers of the 1960s and 1970s; very-large-scale integrated circuits of the 1980s; parallel processing (1980s) and distributed computing over today's Internet, as in SETI@Home.
Thus the SETI paradigm is a kind of Frankenstein's monster of old body parts collected from the last two centuries that somehow walks and talks but cannot align with the world in which it now finds itself. Why does SETI hold so to its rigid paradigm? Perhaps because it cannot face the prospect of changes that could undermine the very reason for its existence. The Plan for this Page Extra Dimensions. OSEN Presents: Dr. Paul LaViolette - Dev. Subquantum Kinetics Video. Subquantum kinetics. Nucleon.pdf (application/pdf Object) Science, Physics and Technology Discussion Forums -> Sub-Quantum Kinetic's Impressive Verifications. I posted this information in the 'Physics General' area, with no responses. Actually, though, I should have posted here, to begin with. Hopefully, somebody with qualifications will respond.... (Attention moderator: feel free to delete the other thread.) I have been reading (and struggling) with the book Subquantum Kinetics by Paul Violette, Ph.D.
The end of the book has an impressive list of claims concerning experimental evidence which is said to support subquantum kinetics. Does anybody have any idea how much attention LaViolette's work has received by working physicists, and what their (hopefully written) opinions might be? Or, of course, he may be wrong. A non-technical description of subquantum kinetics is found here: A partial list of claims (the list at the end of the book seems larger) made for Subquantum Kinetics is found at: Here is the content of that page: Verification (2001): Drs.
Sub-Quantum Kinetics' impressive verifications. I have been reading (and struggling) with the book Subquantum Kinetics by Paul Violette, Ph.D. Basically, he postulates a subquantum layer (or layers), not directly observable, which give rise to matter (and anti-matter) in a manner similar to patterns forming in non-linear chemical kinetic systems, such as the Belousov-Zhabotinskii reaction. The end of the book has an impressive list of claims concerning experimental evidence which is said to support subquantum kinetics. Does anybody have any idea how much attention LaViolette's work has received by working physicists, and what their (hopefully written) opinions might be? Google-ing around did not yield a lot of information. Or, of course, he may be wrong. A non-technical description of subquantum kinetics is found here: A partial list of claims (the list at the end of the book seems larger) made for Subquantum Kinetics is found at: