Fighting Internet piracy: CES takes on SOPA vs. OPEN debate. While thousands of tech vendors frantically demoed new gadgets and apps at the giant Consumer Electronics Show in Las Vegas, a debate over the future of the Internet and how the government may regulate distribution of (often pirated) content was taking place down the hall. As Ars readers know, bills like the Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) and the Online Protection & Enforcement of Digital Trade Act (OPEN) offer competing approaches to cracking down on piracy. But SOPA, introduced in the House of Representatives, and a similar Senate bill called the Protect IP Act (PIPA) have garnered scorn for potentially placing technical barriers on the Internet and even harming parties that have no intent to break the law.
Copyright groups, in turn, think OPEN—which takes a "follow the money" approach, putting power in the International Trade Commission rather than the Department of Justice—won't do enough to protect owners of copyrighted material. The argument for SOPA SOPA could "break" the Internet. Forget SOPA: Copyright owners must build a better BitTorrent. While copyright owners test the legal limits of website takedown processes and push legislation greatly expanding powers to limit file sharing on the open Internet, a company that helps corporations protect intellectual property argues there is a better way: create more user-friendly services for acquiring legitimate content.
Envisional, a firm familiar to Ars readers because of a study funded by NBC Universal 12 months ago, has produced data that content owners might say is an argument in favor of pending legislation like Protect-IP and the Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA), which have been criticized by many advocates of Internet freedom. But in a presentation at the Consumer Electronics Show titled "The State of Digital Piracy," Envisional's head of piracy intelligence, David Price, said the large levels of pirated content downloaded on sites and BitTorrent proves something else: that content owners aren't offering enough legitimate, user-friendly avenues to get content.
CloudFlare named "tech pioneer" after protecting LulzSec website. In LulzSec’s case, the denial of service attacks came quickly after the group released information from its Sony hacks, but the site stayed up. In a blog post two months ago, CloudFlare boss Matthew Prince described how the attacks made CloudFlare’s service better: The experience of being attacked by some of the Internet’s most notorious hackers has validated CloudFlare’s core value proposition: if you can share data about attacks across a network, rather than keeping it siloed within each organization, everyone using that network can benefit.
As hackers tried to take down LulzSec, CloudFlare recorded all the patterns of the attacks. In the last 3 weeks, we’ve generated more than 1 million new rules to better mitigate threats targeted at our users. Those rules were propagated in realtime to benefit the whole CloudFlare community. We’ve written about this benefit previously and it was truly awesome to watch as the system rapidly got smarter and smarter as more attacks were launched. Indie filmakers tackle indie games in Indie Game: The Movie. "Before, we knew it, we had the material for the film that we actually wanted to make, but didn’t set out to. In Super Meat Boy and FEZ, we had a narrative about making and releasing a game—filmed in real time. " The film also focuses on the story of Jonathan Blow, interweaving the story of the already complete Braid with the other two games still in progress.
IGTM was initially funded through donations from Kickstarter; the film managed to surpass its funding goal of $15,000 to receive more than $23,000. But as the film expanded in scope, that money began to run out, and so a second funding campaign began earlier this week, launched alongside a new trailer. This time the funding goal was reached in less than 24 hours. And with just under a month left to go, nearly 900 people have already helped IGTM surpass the $40,000 funding plateau, $5,000 more than the initial goal. "But, in doing both our Kickstarters we structured them not as a donation campaign, but more as a preorder campaign. German police seize Pirate Party servers, looking at Anon's toolkit.
Acting on a French request for assistance, German police today confiscated German Pirate Party servers—apparently hoping to search the prominent collaboration tool widely used within Anonymous to select targets for attack. Authorities appear to be concerned about a possible attack on French energy giant EDF. The German Pirate Party said in a statement that it does not believe itself to be a target of the investigation and expressed willingness “within its legal obligations” to aid French police: The [Pirate Party] Board does not have information that indicates the necessity to take all servers of the Pirate Party off-line. According to the information it has been provided with, only one single public service on a virtual server of the party was affected. The disconnection of all servers is a massive intrusion into the communications infrastructure of the sixth largest party in Germany.
Anonymous' main communications tools have been hit hard in the last two weeks. Capsized: a beautiful 2D side-scroller for the FPS crowd. When you crash-land on an alien planet, you find yourself alone and in constant danger. Everything on this planet seems focused on killing you, but you have no choice but to explore and stay alive. Sounds a bit like Metroid, doesn’t it? It’s actually the premise behind a new indie PC game called Capsized. But while the game looks and sounds like yet another Metroidvania-esque adventure, it’s actually something quite different, with a big focus on frantic, strategic combat heavily influenced by first-person shooters. Capsized was developed by just two people, artist Jesse McGibney and programmer Lee Vermeulen, who together form Alientrap Games. “We actually had all the levels in about a year ago, you could play from beginning to end, so this past year has entirely been about polishing and playtesting,” Vermeulen told Ars.
The game itself is surprising. New bill upgrades unauthorized Internet streaming to a felony. Two months ago, US Intellectual Property Enforcement Coordinator Victoria Espinel produced her wishlist of changes to US law. One item in particular caught our interest—the suggestion that the online streaming of copyrighted content be bumped up to a full-scale felony. Late last week, Senators Amy Klobuchar (D-MN) and John Cornyn (R-TX) introduced just such a bill. The text of S. 978 isn't yet available from the official THOMAS system, but Klobuchar's office sent us a copy of the brief bill. Under current law, "reproducing" and "distributing" copyrighted works are felony charges and cover P2P transfers and Web downloads. But streaming is a "public performance" rather than a "distribution"—and holding a public performance without a proper license is not a felony.
S. 978 adds "public performance" to the felony list. Online streamers can now face up to five years in prison and a fine in cases where: Movie makers and theater owners support the bill. National Jukebox now online, serving up hits from the early 1900s. But what the National Jukebox really offers is a deep glimpse into a world in which the categories that we’ve attached to genres—”classical,” “popular,” and “opera”—weren’t always so clear. This was an age when pop orchestra leaders played Berlioz, marching band conductors wrote operas, and opera divas sang “Home Sweet Home” for their often working class fans. It was a time when it wasn’t always so easy to tell a Ragtime tune from the scherzo of a symphony. One of the best aspects of the Jukebox is that you can create your own playlists, adding selections and enjoying them on an ongoing basis as you search for more content. The Victor Talking Machine Company and other outfits captured these masterpieces not with electronic microphones, but via wide coned horns that siphoned the sounds into a little diaphragm, the vibrations of which were etched into waxed cylinders.
Devices with steel needles then played the records back into a smaller tone arm tube. Privacy groups applaud Senator Rockefeller's "Do Not Track" bill. Senator Jay Rockefeller (D-WV) has introduced a new "Do Not Track" bill to Congress that aims to hold companies accountable for collecting information on consumers after they've expressed a desire to opt out. Called the Do-Not-Track Online Act of 2011 (PDF), the bill would create a "universal legal obligation" for companies to honor users' opt-out requests on the Internet and mobile devices, and would give the Federal Trade Commission the power to take action against companies that don't comply.
"Recent reports of privacy invasions have made it imperative that we do more to put consumers in the driver’s seat when it comes to their personal information," Rockefeller said in a statement. "I believe consumers have a right to decide whether their information can be collected and used online. This bill offers a simple, straightforward way for people to stop companies from tracking their movements online. " Positive reaction from privacy groups. Senator questions Apple over iPhone tracking. Sen. Al Franken (D-MN) wants answers. Security researchers today revealed the existence of a file on iPhones and on their computer backups that logs detailed cell phone triangulation data—and has ever since iOS 4 was released last summer.
The information is stored unencrypted by default, and is simple to access. That announcement led Franken to fire off a two-page letter (PDF) today, asking nine pointed questions of Apple CEO Steve Jobs. Franken first outlines scenarios in which the release of this data could pose a problem. "Anyone who gains access to this single file could likely determine the location of the user's home, the businesses he frequents, the doctors he visits, the schools his children attend, and the trips he has taken over the past months or even a year," he writes.
Which raises the obvious question: how would an attacker get access to the data? "There are numerous ways in which this information could be abused by criminals and bad actors. Europe pledges to name and shame bad non-neutral ISPs. Europe's major new telecoms law comes into effect on May 25, and it avoids any explicit net neutrality rules. But European Commissioner Neelie Kroes, once known for hammering Microsoft during its European antitrust lawsuit, says she will personally keep an eye on any Internet problems that might arise from blocking, throttling, or lying about actual connection speeds. If problems arise that can't be solved simply by switching ISPs, Kroes says she's ready to legislate. In the meantime, she plans to shame ISPs into good behavior. Europe's approach to net neutrality has always differed from that in the US. The European Commission has long touted “competition” as the solution to potential problems, pointing in part to the line-sharing rules in many European countries as the source of this competition.
That difference extends to traffic management and prioritization of content, which is viewed more favorably in Europe. There's reason for such concern. Pirate Bay becomes "Research Bay" to aid P2P researchers. The Cybernorms group at Sweden's Lund University has partnered with The Pirate Bay to "help researchers to better understand habits and norms within the file-sharing community"—and the site has temporarily rechristened itself "The Research Bay" in response. Cybernorms started in 2009 at Lund as a research project from a PhD student in the Sociology of Law department. The idea was to look at how real-world norms interact with laws concerning file-sharing, and early work in the field came to a stark conclusion. A 2009 paper (PDF) based on initial Cybernorms research concluded first of all that there are "no social norms that hinder illegal file sharing.
The surrounding imposes no moral or normative obstruction for the respondents file sharing of copyrighted content. " Furthermore, the research found that 75 percent of 15-25 year olds had no plans to stop swapping copyrighted files just because it was illegal. Oracle gives up on OpenOffice after community forks the project. In a statement issued on Friday, Oracle announced that it intends to discontinue commercial development of the OpenOffice.org (OOo) office suite. The move comes several months after key members of the OOo community and a number of major corporate contributors forked OOo to create a vendor-neutral alternative. OOo is one of many open source software projects that Oracle obtained in its acquisition of Sun. OOo has long been plagued by governance issues and friction between its corporate stakeholders. Sun's copyright assignment policies and bureaucratic code review process significantly hindered community participation in the project.
Oracle declined to address these issues after its acquisition of Sun and exacerbated the friction by failing to engage with the OOo community in a transparent and open way. A group of prominent OOo contributors eventually decided to fork the project, creating an alternative called LibreOffice. The power of the fork. European ad industry pushes new tracking, transparency rules. European advertisers have begun hopping on board with a new set of guidelines (PDF) that will allow users to block cookie tracking. The rules, developed by an industry group called the Internet Advertising Bureau Europe (IAB Europe), come just over a month before Europe is expected to issue its own legal guidelines for online advertisers. The self-regulatory framework isn't just about avoiding being tracked—the goal is to offer transparency to consumers about which sites are using their cookie data, when, and for what purpose.
Participating companies will display an icon on their behaviorally tracked advertisements that signifies that they're participating in the Online Behavioural Advertising (OBA) Framework. When people click the icon, they'll be able to get more information about the ads and have the option to turn off the ad's tracking element. P2P lawyer: more settlements since former-lobbyist judge's ruling. Last month, RIAA-lobbyist-turned-federal-judge Beryl Howell ruled that three mass P2P file-sharing lawsuits before her in Washington, DC could proceed. The Hollywood Reporter called it, rather hyperbolically, "the most important decision to date in the ongoing mass-litigation campaign" (several other federal judges had already come to opposite conclusions). But Howell's work has had an impact—as far away as Illinois, more anonymous P2P defendants are coming forward to settle. So says Illinois' lone attorney bringing these mass P2P suits. John Steele, divorce-lawyer-turned-porn-copyright-specialist, has had a rough couple of months before judges for the Northern District of Illinois, based in Chicago.
He tried moving a recent case downstate, to the Southern District, and he also tried to turn it into a "reverse class action" lawsuit against file-sharers. This hasn't gone well; a judge is currently staying Steele's discovery, and the Electronic Frontier Foundation is opposing his tactics. Report: Piracy a "global pricing problem" with only one solution. Alleged WikiLeaker could face death penalty. Net neutrality rules: coming December 21. Priority access deals could result in "slow suicide" for ISPs. Did the Republican House landslide kill net neutrality? Judge realizes: on the Internet, no one can tell you're a kid.
Fox throws anti-net neutrality pie at Cablevision in carriage wars. Former music label boss: beat piracy by selling albums for £1. P2P investigations now illegal in Switzerland. The end of used books, music, games? Court guts "First Sale" "Piracy" sounds too sexy, say rightsholders. Pirate Party membership plummets post Pirate Bay verdict. Back room net neutrality deal? Reform groups up in arms. US goes after movie pirates in Estonia, counterfeiters in Tanzan.
UK regulator: net neutrality rules bad for consumers.