information-economy

American Immigration Council
Bashyam Spiro LLP Immigration and Nationality Law Bashyam Spiro LLP Immigration and Nationality Law Every business has a story. Our story started over 15 years ago when two lawyers decided to dedicate their careers to helping people immigrate to the United States. Since then, Bashyam Spiro & Coats LLP Immigration Law Group, with offices in Raleigh, North Carolina and Minneapolis, Minnesota, has focused solely on the practice of Immigration and NationalityThe country of a person’s citizenship or country in which the person is deemed a nationalA person owing permanent allegiance to a state. Law. We represent corporate and family immigration clients in all 50 states and around the world.
University of San Diego School of LawOctober 7, 2009 University of Illinois Law Review, Vol. 2009, No. 5, 2009 Abstract: The idea of authority is a fabrication. Claims of moral right to be obeyed owe their historic salience to the self-interest of claimants. When Enlightenment scholars demolished the divine right of kings, they should have disabused us of the right, not just of the notions that it came from the divine and belonged to kings. The Empty Idea of Authority by Laurence Claus The Empty Idea of Authority by Laurence Claus
Patent Law Blog (Patently-O): Rethinking the USPTO Examiner Coun The USPTO uses a count system as one way to measure patent examiner productivity. Examiners receive one count for sending out an initial office action and a second count when the case is “disposed.” As you might guess, a case is disposed of when it either issues as a patent or is abandoned by the applicant. However, many folks are surprised that the applicant’s filing of a request for continued examination (RCE) also counts as a disposal. As the chart shows below, this count incentive may well be driving a flood of RCE filings. Patent Law Blog (Patently-O): Rethinking the USPTO Examiner Coun
Patent Law Blog (Patently-O): Bilski Briefs The question of patentable subject matter has returned to the Supreme Court — this time with a focus on business methods. In January 2009, an en banc Federal Circuit implemented the “machine or transformation test” as the exclusive test for determining whether a claimed process qualifies as patentable subject matter under 35 U.S.C. 101. Now, the case is pending before the Supreme Court with two focused questions: Patent Law Blog (Patently-O): Bilski Briefs
TEDTalks: Four Ways to Fix a Broken Legal System