Data Mining Reveals the Six Basic Emotional Arcs of Storytelling. Back in 1995, Kurt Vonnegut gave a lecture in which he described his theory about the shapes of stories. In the process, he plotted several examples on a blackboard. “There is no reason why the simple shapes of stories can’t be fed into computers,” he said. “They are beautiful shapes.” The video is available on YouTube. Vonnegut was representing in graphical form an idea that writers have explored for centuries—that stories follow emotional arcs, that these arcs can have different shapes, and that some shapes are better suited to storytelling than others. Vonnegut mapped out several arcs in his lecture.
Vonnegut is not alone in attempting to categorize stories into types, although he was probably the first to do it in graphical form. However, there is little agreement on the number of different emotional arcs that arise in stories or their shape. Their method is straightforward. The results make for interesting reading. The six basic emotional arcs are these: Critical changes: Structuralism, deconstruction, surrealism. Colours. Covertext » Is the artist necessary for making art today? (Pt.1) Answers by Jono Podmore, Mi You, Max Stolkin, Nick Montfort, Antonia Low, Hannes Bajohr, Lina Viste Grønli, Anthony Moore, Christoph Westermeier, Birgit Kempker and Jemma Cullen YES Once, twice and thrice YES YES YES I despair of the dorks, the dopes, the Enose and Beanos in my business who claim, while hiding behind their flappy lappy topses, that an algorithm has created the deeply uninspiring, abstracted and acoustically challenged drivel we are expected to allow to fall oft uninvited into our shell-likes.
Not themselves, of course – god forbid any human responsibility in this supercollided brave new interwebscape. THE TRUTH A musical score is an algorithm – a structure and a set of instructions. Mozza’s Requiem (KV 626) is a different sounding piece with every performance yet it is his piece. He wrote the algorithm. Inescapable. Case closed. Post script – exhibit A All those lovely 70’s home organs. Jono P Proposition: Axiom 1: Definition 2: Axiom 2: Hello Max, #! Stephen ramsay reading machines toward an algorithmic criticism. Computer scientists quantify elements of writing style that differentiate successful fiction. (Phys.org) —Imagine the challenge publishers face, pouring over thousands of manuscripts to determine if a book will be a hit.
Stony Brook Department of Computer Science Assistant Professor Yejin Choi thinks she has a tool to bring some science to that art, and she is co-author of a paper, Success with Style: Using Writing Style to Predict the Success of Novels, which was unveiled at the conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) 2013. "Predicting the success of literary works poses a massive dilemma for publishers and aspiring writers alike," Choi said. "We examined the quantitative connection between writing style and successful literature.
Based on novels across different genres, we investigated the predictive power of statistical stylometry in discriminating successful literary works, and identified the stylistic elements that are more prominent in successful writings. " Dr. The researchers took 1000 sentences from the beginning of each book.
Dr.