Nuclear pearltree
What U.S. Could Do if Pakistan Loses Control Over Nuclear Weapons
Print Share Email Twitter Facebook LinkedIn By Elaine M.
A contaminated teddy bear - ScienceWonk | ScienceWonk - Pale Moon
How much contamination would you find acceptable on your daughter’s teddy bear?
Nuclear weapons: Who has what?
More than two dozen countries have nuclear power, but only a few have nuclear weapons or are suspected of pursuing nuclear weapons.
Happy New Year! There have been five particularly horrific years of living dangerously in the nuclear age. The first was, most jarringly, 1945, when the Bomb made its spectacular appearance. No advance in the history of warfare was more jarring than a city-killing weapon that could be delivered by surprise for which there was no defense. The second period of maximum danger was 1949-1950, when the Soviet Union tested its first atomic bomb, President Truman endorsed a crash program to proceed with far more powerful thermonuclear weapons, the People’s Republic of China was born, and the Korean War began. It was an open question whether or not atomic bombs would again be used to end a prolonged land war in Asia that was at times going very badly for the United States before it ground to a bitter stalemate.
Michael Krepon • Years of Living Dangerously
Global Security Newswire - China Augments Nuke Arsenal: Pentagon
Print Share Email Twitter Facebook LinkedIn China's nuclear arsenal is being augmented through development of a missile that is capable of carrying a number of warheads and can be moved between different locations, the U.S. Defense Department said in a report issued this week (see GSN , Aug. 25). The yearly Pentagon assessment of Chinese military capabilities estimates that Beijing holds as many as 75 long-range missiles tipped with nuclear warheads, along with 120 intermediate- and medium-range systems, the Washington Times reported. “China is both qualitatively and quantitatively improving its strategic missile forces,” according to the report.Cable Viewer
Viewing cable 08PARIS1227, SOLICITING PLEDGES TO FUND THE NUCLEAR THREAT Understanding cables Every cable message consists of three parts: The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was. The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject. The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables ( browse by origin to find them) or additional comment.
Nuclear organisations
A Warhead’s Life | Ploughshares Fund
The page you requested may have moved. For your convenience, a search was performed using keywords from the URL you are requesting. Please check below to see if one of the results is the page you were looking for. A Warhead’s LifeU.S Nuclear weapons budget
Print Share Email Twitter Facebook LinkedIn An ongoing impasse at the international Conference on Disarmament in Geneva, Switzerland, might be broken through a U.N. conference, a specially formed commission or a team of prominent individuals, U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki- moon said on Wednesday (see GSN , May 17). The 65-nation conference in 2009 ended a deadlock that had lasted for more than a decade, agreeing to a work plan that would focus on preparing a fissile material cutoff pact and three other issues: nuclear disarmament, a ban against space-based weapons, and an agreement by nuclear-armed states not to use such weapons against countries that do not possess atomic armaments. While Pakistan initially backed the work plan, it later canceled its consent and demanded further consideration of the program. Decisions at the conference are made by consensus (see GSN , July 12).
Global Security Newswire - U.N. Chief Floats Measures to Break Conference on Disarmament Stalemate
U.S. Energy Information Administration - EIA - Independent Statistics and Analysis
There are about 18,530 individual generators at about 6,600 operational power plants in the United States with a nameplate generation capacity of at least one MegaWatt. A power plant can have one or more generators, and some generators may use more than one type of fuel. Learn More:
Chernobyl
Fukushima nuclear power stations
What if we try the nuclear option ?
Email this ShareThis Monday, December 27, 2010 Three-out-of-four U.S. voters (73%) fear a terrorist threat more than a nuclear attack. A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that just 16% believe a potential nuclear attack is a greater threat to the United States.
73% Fear Terrorists More Than Nuclear Attack
Project on Nuclear Issues
About the Project on Nuclear Issues Addressing the complex array of nuclear weapons challenges will require a solid foundation of expertise across numerous sectors. Because most of these challenges are long-term, the Project on Nuclear Issues (PONI) aims to build and sustain a vibrant community of young nuclear experts from the military, national laboratories, industry, academia, and the policy community.Nuclear wonks, watchers
Nuclear humor
22 December 2010 Last updated at 12:58 ET By Gordon Corera Security correspondent, BBC News IAEA's John Kelly on the dangers of transporting nuclear fuel rods A shipment of nuclear fuel has arrived in Russia after a top-secret international operation to remove it from Serbia, where it was feared terrorists could seize it to make a nuclear or dirty bomb. In the dead of night, armed men in balaclavas surround a long convoy of trucks in the woods just outside Belgrade. Radios crackle as they prepare for a long journey.
A secret journey to take Serbian nuclear fuel to safety
Nonsense about New START and ICBMs » FAS Strategic Security Blog
"This temporary computer glitch was not critical to our security because having hundreds of nuclear bombs ready to launch at a moment’s notice is not critical to our security. These weapons, and more importantly, how they are deployed and kept ready, are a Cold War anachronism. (Far from undermining arguments for New START, this incident highlights one of the greatest shortcomings of the treaty — that it does nothing to reduce readiness levels on both sides.) There may be reasons to oppose the New START (although I can’t think of any) but this incident is not relevant to that debate, or at least should not be." by Oct 29
"During the Cold War, the stakes were ideological control of the future of the planet, that is, the stakes were infinite. So the threatened pain had to be infinite. And what are the stakes now? What is the potential dispute between the U.S. and Russia that can be deterred with 1550 weapons but not with 1500?" by Oct 29
"First, this episode was not the big deal it is suggested to be; at no time did it make any difference to the nation’s security. Some 50 missiles were offline, with 50 nuclear warheads, or about 3% of the nation’s ready arsenal. The missiles were never out of control. It is not as though they could have launched themselves" by Oct 29