"The State" vs Adam 'Ademo' Mueller (EDITED TRIAL FOOTAGE) It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
-Voltaire On October 3rd, 2011 Darren Murphy, a Manchester police employee, assaulted 17-year-old Frank Harrington at Manchester’s West High School. The next day, Ademo Freeman called the high school and the police department to help obtain accountability. He included portions of the calls on a video update, and a couple of months later, was threatened with three counts of felony wiretapping, each of which carried a maximum of seven years in prison. On August 13th, 2012 a jury at Hillsborough County Superior Court found Ademo “guilty.” Despite threats levied at him by the claimed “authorities” Ademo Freeman has relentlessly stood up for what’s right. Ordinarily, a person leaving a courtroom with a conviction behind him would wear a somber face. To support Ademo & his activism consider donating to his WePay campaign* Donate For complete overview visit: Let prosecutor Michael Valentine know your thoughts: (603) 627-5605 Write Ademo:
NHLA Forum - Index. NH liberty activist beats Deerfield in Supreme Court. Sponsor: - Nashua police get overtime at 33 hour mark.
Partial transcript of text/subtitles that appear in the vid (there may be unlisted gaps between the sentences): ' Spring 2014: Nashua's rulers meet to hear Mayor Donnalee Lozeau present her budget at a public hearing. That is so rare... most politicians will say "I don't know enough about the situation," even if you're not asking them to comment on the specific situation.
That question was a little unfair to the cops...Fortune Mag reported they tasered the women for allegedly failing to leave a store, after being ordered not to videotape alleged discrimination by the store, after being denied a second cell phone. ' This vid is (or is supposed to be!) Some or possibly all the video and audio in this clip...is likely available... for you to use. Like what you see here? How to buy yourself an ad on the...
Music by That's right... he is my bro! New Hampshire Liberty Alliance. 15Mar2011… 0766h 02/08/12 0575s 02/08/12 0673s AN ACT permitting the audio and video recording of a public official while in the course of his or her official duties.
SPONSORS: Rep. Baldasaro, Rock 3; Rep. COMMITTEE: Criminal Justice and Public Safety This bill permits the audio and video recording of a public official while in the course of his or her official duties. Explanation: Matter added to current law appears in bold italics. Matter removed from current law appears [in brackets and struckthrough.] Matter which is either (a) all new or (b) repealed and reenacted appears in regular type. In the Year of Our Lord Two Thousand Eleven. Court tells police to let the public videotape. N.H. House bill would allow recordings of public officials » Latest News. A bill up for a vote next week could protect the right of citizens to record police officers and other public officials.
House Bill 145 would make it legal for anyone to make video or audio recordings of public officials on the job, including police officers on duty. The committee of conference finalized the bill yesterday and it will be voted on by the full House next week, according to bill sponsor Rep. Al Baldasaro, R-Londonderry. If approved, the bill would move to Gov. John Lynch's desk. "We've been working on this for about four years now," Baldasaro said. There have been a number of cases where people have caught police officers doing questionable things on tape, according to cosponsor Rep.
"In the Rodney King incident, if it hadn't been for the bystanders, this would never have come out," she said, referring to the victim of police brutality in 1991. Baldasaro said he sponsored the bill because of arrests like Gerard Beloin of New Boston. N.H. House rejects bill to allow recording of public officials » New Hampshire. The New Hampshire House killed a bill yesterday to allow citizens to record public officials, with some arguing it was an unnecessary law.
House Bill 145 would have made it legal for anyone to make video or audio recordings of public officials on the job, including police officers on duty. The bill passed the Senate, but failed in the House, 148-175. Bill co-sponsor Rep. Jennifer Coffey, R-Andover, said she was disappointed. "I think, unfortunately, some people had misconceptions about the bill," she said.
Some lawmakers thought the First Circuit Court of Appeals decision in Glik v. "They were saying the Glik decision covered it all, so there was no reason for this legislation," he said. The Attorney General's Office wrote a letter to all state law enforcement in March, explaining the court decision and its implications for local departments.
Some legislators argued the letter was enough.