pearltrees html popular pearltrees search

What's next?

Guess what? I’ve already uninstalled that and the Wall Street Journal and New York Times apps are next. They suck. Is 2011 like 1994 for Apple, Twitter, Facebook, and the Web? http://scobleizer.com/2010/04/11/is-2011-like-1994-for-apple-twitter-facebook-and-the-web/

With More Flash, Is Google About To Cut Off The HTML5 Nose To Sp January 4, 1976 January 24, 1980, NASDAQ:AAPL Started by Steve Jobs, Steve Wozniak, and Ronald Wayne, Apple has expanded from computers to consumer electronics over the last 30 years, officially changing their name from Apple Computer, Inc. to Apple, Inc. in January 2007. Among the key offerings from Apple’s product line are: Pro line laptops (MacBook Pro) and desktops (Mac Pro), consumer line laptops (MacBook) and desktops (iMac), servers (Xserve), Apple TV, the Mac OS X and Mac OS X Server operating systems, the iPod (offered with... http://techcrunch.com/2010/03/29/google-flash-apple/

http://www.scripting.com/stories/2010/01/31/whatIfFlashWereAnOpenStand.html 2. It's kind of hard to defend Flash because it's a company-owned thing, not an open standard. 3. What if Flash were an open standard? (Scripting News)

So for those keeping track, Adobe plans to have versions of Flash 10.1 for Android, BlackBerry, Symbian, webOS and Windows Mobile by next year. But keep an eye on the Open Screen Project and Flash’s move beyond handsets and PCs in the coming months. The iPhone is awesome, but getting the full web experience on your set-top box or TV is something that represents a far bigger opportunity. Related research and analysis from GigaOM Pro: http://gigaom.com/2009/10/05/adobes-open-screen-project-is-bigger-than-the-iphone/ Adobe’s Open Screen Project: Bigger Than the iPhone – GigaOM

http://macdailynews.com/2010/05/06/opera_joins_in_apple_vs_flash_argument/ Goss reports, “…It is clear that the web giants are not rushing to defend Adobe from the might of Apple, and that in itself speaks volumes.” Full article here . “Opera’s product analyst Phillip Grønvold believes that support for Flash is critical at the current time, but that times are changing fast as HTML5 moves closer,” Goss reports. MacDailyNews

http://arstechnica.com/software/news/2010/03/adobe-to-unify-coldfusion-flex-flash-with-flash-builder-4.ars Flash Builder 4 includes support for Adobe's still beta Flash Catalyst rapid UI design tool, which, along with Flex 4 , will enable designers to work on the front-end independently of back-end development. It also allows connecting to a number of back-end environments, including PHP, Java, Adobe's LiveCycle, as well as the aforementioned ColdFusion. Support for accessing REST and SOAP-based Web services—a must in today's cloud-based environments—is also included. Adobe to unify ColdFusion, Flex, Flash with Flash Builder 4

Enabling innovation doesn’t require magic. It requires open platforms. Apple understood this with the Mac OS. Remember the original Macintosh advertisements? On a Mac, any developer can build any app they want, and deliver it through any channel. Enabling innovation isn't magic http://blogs.adobe.com/flashplatform/2010/01/enabling_innovation_isnt_magic.html

http://iwantflash.com/ iWantFlash! The site has been live for less than 24 hours and only has been promoted by about 30 tweets, 300+ signatures in a few hours is nothing to be upset about. I am sure over the next few days their will be more. I like my iPhone and I may get a iPad, but I have moved to palms webOS platform so that I can develop for the phone I use the most. Palms hardware is much more user controlable than any of apples mobile hardware at the moment and by the end of February it will be running flash. If Adobe can get flash running well without hurtting the battery life on the Pre which is almost the same hardware as the iPhone 3GS then the road block is Apple.

The State Of Web Development Ripped Apart In 25 Tweets By One Ma http://techcrunch.com/2010/04/30/joe-hewitt-web-development/ @ppk That’s sort of what is happening with mobile web vs. native mobile apps, except app stores don’t extend the browser, they replace it. @slauriat “best viewed in X” was not as bad as “buy another phone”, which is what we got for letting the web go to shit so apps could rise. @ppk Yes, exactly. I’d rather developers had forced users to launch different browsers instead of making watered down x-browser sites. @ppk As someone who has tried to do both cutting edge native and web iPhone apps, iPhone Safari is a joke compared to iPhone Cocoa.

Friedman has ben working secretly on this project for the last six months. You can tell he’s excited about it. He believes the Web is finally ready to ditch Flash for documents. Scribd CTO: “We Are Scrapping Flash And Betting The Company On H http://techcrunch.com/2010/05/05/scribd-html5/

HTML5 vs flash: the controversy

http://www.gottabemobile.com/2010/02/21/my-take-on-the-flash-controversy/ My take on the Flash controversy | GottaBeMobile For example, one thing I really hate are Flash-based navigation menus. Using Flash to display content is fine. Using it to get to content is bad. The problem stems from lack of accessibility.

http://www.zdnet.fr/actualites/gianduia-l-alternative-d-apple-pour-flash-et-silverlight-39751497.htm La solution d'Apple sera certainement compatible avec les configurations les plus exotiques. Sinon, GWT existe depuis maintenant 5 ans et fait déjà ça... C'est même l'inverse de Flash ou Silverlight, qui ne fonctionnent bien qu'avec les technos de Adobe et Microsoft. Sur le principe, c'est la même chose: l'utilisateur écrit toute la partie "client" de son appli en Java. GWT consomme ensuite ces fichiers pour générer le code javascript correspondant. (Pour les allergiques, un tas d'outil permettent de générer votre interface graphique en WYSIWYG: What You See Is What You Get. Gianduia : l'alternative d'Apple pour Flash et Silverlight - Act

Ca m'intéresse pas mal, en effet ;-) Merci Ludo by Patrice May 13

Flash On Touch-Based Devices