comité Balladur - Grand Paris
De l'utilité du « corps des Ponts » par T. Duclaux - Grand Paris
Partager l'article !
The post-industrialising city: political perspectives and cultur
collective learning - cultural pluralism - informational city - institutional connectivity - post-industrialisation - risk society This revised version was published online in August 2006 with corrections to the Cover Date. Many Western cities face marked changes that are associated with post-industrialisation of the urban environment.
Foreign Policy: Why Hawks Win
The effect of this failure in conflict situations can be pernicious. A policymaker or diplomat involved in a tense exchange with a foreign government is likely to observe a great deal of hostile behavior by that country's representatives. Some of that behavior may indeed be the result of deep hostility. But some of it is simply a response to the current situation as it is perceived by the other side. What is ironic is that individuals who attribute others' behavior to deep hostility are quite likely to explain away their own behavior as a result of being "pushed into a corner" by an adversary.
Why Hawks Win -- From Prospect Theory to Foreign Policy Phenom
Those of us more familiar with rhetorical theory can also contribute to this discussion, by elaborating on the ideological underpinnings of the world views and future imaginings that affect decision-makers’ evaluation of the status quo and future consequences of alternative actions. To Kahneman and Renshon’s claim that “a bias in favor of hawkish beliefs and preferences is built into the fabric of the human mind,” I would add that the bias is rooted in language as both a constraint upon and expression of cognition. Fortunately, decision theory and Prospect Theory in particular are treated more expansively in a growing segment of the foreign affairs literature.
Bias and war: Why hawks win « Bias and Belief
Advertisement
Logical inference and human rationality
Therefore, classical logical cannot be the only measuring stick of rationality.
Terms of Service | Privacy | Content Policy | Copyright © 1999 – 2012 Google
Bounded Rationality: A Study of Large Infrastructure Projects an
théories éco et gouvernance
C'est vrai - notre idée est que l'éditeur est le seul maitre de son édition, et que c'est donc lui qui décide seul où mettre les operles qu'il recoit. by Patrice Mar 1
EN revanche je ne comprend pas pourquoi tu trouve ca "dur pour les arbres géants". Quel est le problème excatement? il y a peut-être bien d'autres solution by Patrice Mar 1
Je pensais par exemple à mon début d'arbre "share your resume" : en imaginant que le concept fasse flores, tu peux pas avoir plein de cv autour d'un seul noeud, il faut sans doute créer des sous arbres où proposer différents types de perles 'cv' by Frederic Mar 1
d'où la question, serait-il possible que l'émetteur soit à m^ême de suggérer un sous arbre plut^ôt qu'une racine (libre ensuite à l'éditeur de le redéplacer) by Frederic Mar 1
Je sais bien que share your resume n'est pas dans l'esprit d'origine du projet, mais j'aime bien tester les sécantes et les tangentes ;-) by Frederic Mar 1
Yep! A mon avis! Tu peux gérer cela en restant dans le cadre des fonctionnalités actuelles - simplement en écrivant une note qui précise où tu aimerais que l'éditeur mette sa perle - Vives les tangentes et l'inovation d'usage! by Patrice Mar 1
